Moving into a newly built home of one's own and feeling completely at ease there: For many people, this is their lifelong dream. Perhaps you also have this desire and, like many others, are faced with a crucial question: solid house or prefabricated house – what is the better choice?? Reason enough to take a detailed look at both variants and compare them with each other.
Here's how the construction methods differ: Solid house versus prefabricated house in comparison
Their most important characteristic reveal the 2 house types already in their respective designation, which permits at the same time conclusions on the building method. Solid house or prefabricated house, which was rather there? The answer is clearly the first option, which is why it should be mentioned at the outset. The solid construction method already implied in the name ensures materials such as
Typically, the individual components are delivered to the construction site and processed there by different trades. Natural stones generally form the brickwork. They are capable of absorbing and releasing water vapor. This promises a healthy climate inside the solid house. Since the walls store heat optimally, it remains comparatively cool on hot summer days and pleasantly warm on cold winter days. Thanks to the robust walls, good sound insulation can also be expected.
Prefabricated houses have been around since the beginning of the 20th century. The prefabricated houses were built in the early twentieth century as part of the Bauhaus movement. Today they are realized by different enterprises, which take over all important steps up to the ready for occupancy delivery. First, the customer chooses the object of his choice. Ready planned variants present the offerers in catalogs and in the Internet. In addition, model houses can be viewed in specially designed housing estates. Components in the form of walls, roof and ceilings are prefabricated in large production halls. Wood is the dominant material in the carcass. The components of a prefabricated house are assembled on site by the responsible company according to a modular principle. It only takes a few days, provided the basement or floor slab is already prepared.
Which is better: a solid house or a prefabricated house??
One thing in advance: When comparing prefabricated house versus solid house, no generally valid recommendation can be given. It is more helpful to look at individual criteria, which certainly have a slightly different weighting for each prospective builder. This already begins with the duration of the construction phase. With a prefabricated house, this is practically always shorter than with a solid house – for a number of reasons.
After all, it is a standardized process. Components such as mortar and concrete are not used, so there is no need for longer drying times. Whereas solid construction is highly dependent on weather conditions, a prefabricated house can be built largely independently of them.
Many people place particular value on individuality when building their own home. Prefabricated house or solid house – who makes here the race? In this case it is clearly the second option. Building owners are allowed to describe their ideas in detail to an architect, who then implements them in terms of planning technology. The number, size and layout of the rooms, for example, can be freely determined. With prefabricated houses there are limits, because mostly nothing or only little is changeable at the ground plan. Nevertheless, the providers still create customization options. Walls may then be moved or omitted, for example, if they are not part of the load-bearing elements. In addition, additions in the form of balconies or terraces are conceivable.
A not insignificant factor in weighing whether the manufactured or solid home should be the first choice is the personal contribution that can be brought in. House builders often have the desire to lend a hand themselves. Their work can be taken into account as colloquial muscle mortgage as equity in financing. Who has the appropriate abilities, can take over many tasks with the building of a massif house themselves. With the prefabricated house the field of activity remains to a large extent limited to the interior fittings.
Is a solid house more expensive than a prefabricated house?
Ultimately, the decision between prefabricated house or solid house stands and falls with the question of the financial expenditure. This should be considered from two angles: on the one hand, with regard to the price of construction, and on the other hand, with regard to the costs that can be expected in subsequent years. Prefabricated houses are likely to prove a mostly cheaper option simply because of standardized, industrial production. Exceptions may confirm the rule here as well.
In any case, the expenses can be better estimated with a prefabricated house, as these are stipulated in the construction contract. With a massif house exists in principle higher planning expenditure and it more price-intensive materials are used. Furthermore, several trades are involved, whereas with a prefabricated house practically everything comes from a single source. Unforeseen events cannot be ruled out, which can cause the bottom line costs to go up again.
Under the financial aspect also the value stability sorts itself in. Due to the material properties, the solid house is the more robust and durable variant. This means that the first renovation work will probably be carried out later than with a prefabricated house. Solid houses are undoubtedly more stable in value. Their lifespan is generally given as 100 to 120 years. This allows an overall higher proceeds in the event of resale. With prefabricated houses the life span which can be expected lies between 70 and 90 years.